Bibliografía

AutorJavier Framiñán Santas
Páginas271-272

Page 271

Ayres, I., y kleMperer, P., «Limiting patentee’s market power without reducing innovation incentives: the perverse benefits of uncertainty and non-injuctive remedies», Mich. L. Rev., 1999, vol. 97.

Blair, R. D., y cotter, T. F., «Are settlements of patent disputes illegal per se?»,

Antitrust Bull., 2002, vol. 47.
carrier, M. A., «A response to Chief Justice Roberts: Why Antitrust must play a role in the analysis of drug patent settlements», Minn. J.L. Sci.&Tech., 2014, vol. 15. crane, D. A., «Exit payments in settlement of patent infringement lawsuits: antitrust rules and economic implications», Fla. L. Rev., 2002, vol. 54 (cit. Exit payments…). — «Ease over accuracy in assessing patent settlements», Minn. L. Rev., 2004, vol. 88 (cit. Ease over accuracy…).
— «Actavis, the reverse payment fallacy, and the continuing need for regulatory solutions», Minn. J.L. Sci.&Tech., 2014, vol. 15 (cit. Actavis…).
cotter, T. F., «Refining the “presumptive illegality” approach to settlements of patent disputes involving reverse payments: a commentary on Hovenkamp, Janis and Lemley», Minn. L. Rev., 2003, vol. 87 (cit. Refining the presumptive illegality…). — «Antitrust implications of patent settlements involving reverse payments: defending a rebuttable presumption of illegality in light of some recent scholarship», Antitrust L. J., 2004, vol. 71 (cit. Antitrust implications…)
— «FTC v. Actavis, Inc.: When is the rule of reason not the rule of reason?», Minn.

J.L. Sci.&Tech., 2014, vol. 15 (cit. Ftc v. Actavis…).
daVis, J. P., «Applying economics to patent settlements: why reverse payments should be per se illegal», Rutgers L. J., 2009, vol. 41.

HolMan, C. M., «Do reverse payment settlements violate the antitrust laws?», Santa

Clara Computer & High Tech. L. J., 2007, vol. 23.

HoVenkaMp, H., «Anticompetitive patent settlements and the Supreme Court’s Acta-vis decision», Minn. J.L. Sci.&Tech., 2014, vol. 15.

HoVenkaMp, H.; Janis, M., y leMley, M. A., «Anticompetitive settlement of intellectual property disputes», Minn. L. Rev., 2003, vol. 87 (cit. Anticompetitive settlement…).
— «Balancing ease and accuracy in assessing pharmaceutical exclusion payments»,

Minn. L. Rev., 2004, vol. 88 (cit. Balancing ease and accuracy…).

Page 272

LanGenfeld, J., y li, W., «Intellectual property and agreements to settle patent disputes: the case of settlement agreements with payments from branded to generic drug manufacturers», Antitrust L. J., 2003, vol. 70 (cit...

Para continuar leyendo

Solicita tu prueba

VLEX utiliza cookies de inicio de sesión para aportarte una mejor experiencia de navegación. Si haces click en 'Aceptar' o continúas navegando por esta web consideramos que aceptas nuestra política de cookies. ACEPTAR