Índice de autores citados
| Autor | Roberto Scarciglia |
| Páginas | 183-205 |
Page 183
Adams M. (2013), Comparative Law in a Globalizing World: Three Chal-lenges, en Musa S. and De Volder E.M., Reflections on Global Law, Leyden, 131-136.
Adams M. and Griffiths J. (2014), Against 'Comparative Method': Ex-plaining Similarities and Differences, en M. Adams and J. Bomhoff (eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law, Cambridge.
Adams M. and Heirbaut D. (eds.) (2014), The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour ofMark Van Hoecke, Oxford.
AdamsonHoebelE. ([1954] 2006), TheLaw ofthe Primitive Man: A study in Comparative Legal Dynamics, Cambridge MA.
Agamben G. (2009), The Signature ofAll Things: One Method, New York.
Alpa G. (2004), L Arcadia del comparatista. Un saggio di storia e di método, en Markesenis B. (2003), Comparative Law in the Courtroom and Classroom: The Story ofthe Last Thirty-Five Years, Oxford and Portland, trad. it. // método de lia comparazione. II retaggio delpassato e le sfide del futuro, Bologna.
Altemberg B. and Granger S. (1996), Lexis in Contrast: Corpus-based approach, Amsterdam-Philadelfia.
Amari E. ([1857] 1969), Critica di una scienza delle legislazioni compárate, vol. I, Palermo.
Ambrus M. (2009), Comparative Law Method in the Jurisprudence ofthe European Court of Human Rights in the Light ofthe Rule ofLaw, en Erasmus Law Review, vol. 2, n. 3, 2009, 353-371.
Page 184
Ancel M. (1982), Le probléme de la comparabilité et la méthode fonc-tionnelle in droit comparé 3 en Festschriftfür Imre Zajtay. Mélanges in l'honneur d'Imre Zajtay, Tübingen, 1-6.
- (1971), Utilité et méthodes de droit comparé. Eléments d'introduction genérale a I 'étude comparative des droits, Neuchátel.
Ascarelli T. (1952), Studi di diritto comparato e in tema di interpreta-zione, Milano.
Auby J.-B. (2003), La globalisation, le droit etl'État, París.
Ault H.J. and Glendon M.A. (1975), The Importance of Comparative Law in Legal Education: United States Goals and Methods of Legal Education, en Journal of Legal Education, vol. 27, 599-608.
Ajani G. (1997), // modellopost-socialista, Tormo.
Bakardjieva Engelbrekt A. and Nergelius J. (eds.) (2009), New Direc-tions in Comparative Law, Cheltenham.
Basedow J. (2014), Comparative Law andits Clients, en American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 62, n. 4, 821-857.
Benjamín W. ([1955] 1962), Schriften, Berlen, trad. it. Ángelus Novus. Saggi eframmenti, Tormo.
Bergmans B. (1987), L'enseignement d'une terminologie juridique étrangére comme mode d 'approche du droit comparé : I 'exemple de I 'Allemand, en Revue international de droit comparé, n. 1, 87-110.
Berg-SchlosserD. (2001), Comparative Studies: MethodandDesign, en Smelser N.J. and Baltes P.B., en International Encyclopedia ofthe Social & Behavioral Sciences, vol. 4, Oxford, 2427-2433.
Berthelot J.-M. (2001), Programmes, paradigmes, disciplines: pluralité etunité des sciences sociales, en Berthelot J.-M. (ed.), Épistemologie des sciences sociales, París.
Bobek M. (2013), Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Court, Oxford.
BogdanM. (2013), Concise Introduction to Comparative Law, Gronengen.
Page 185
Bogdandy A. von (2016), Compctrcttive Constitutional Law as a Social Science? A Hegelian Reaction to Ran Hirschl's Comparative Matter, MPIL Research Paper Series, n.o 2016-09.
Bognetti G. (1994), Introduzione al diritto costituzionale comparato. II método, Tormo.
Brand O. (2007), Conceptual comparisons: Towards a coherent methodol-ogy of comparative legal studies, en Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 32, 405-466.
Breyer S. (2013), On reading Proust, en The New York Review ofBooks, 22-10-2013, 17-19.
Brysk A. (2002), Globalization and Human Rights, London. Buchler J. (1961), The Concept ofMethod, New York and London.
Bussani M. (2010), Il diritto dell'Occidente: Geopolitica delle rególe globali, Tormo.
Bussani M. and Mattei U. (eds.) (2012), The Cambridge Companion of Comparative Law, Cambridge.
Calvino I. (1983), Palomar, Tormo.
Cassese S. (ed.) (2016), Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law, Cheltenham.
- (2009a), Il diritto globale. Giustizia e democrazia oltre lo Stato, Torino.
- (2009b), Il Tribunali di Babele. I giudici alia ricerca di un nuovo ordine globale, Roma.
Cassidy R.M. (2015), Reforming theLaw School Curriculum from the Top Down, en Journal of Legal Education, vol. 64, n. 3, 428-442.
Cerda-Guzman C. (2016), «Jurisdictiones constitutionnelles vs mesures anti-terroristes» réactions communes de juge constitutionnels face a lutte contre le terrorisme, en Le Quenio A. (ed.),Les réactions constitutionnelles a la globalisation, Bruxelles, 71-92.
ChodoshH.E. (1999), Comparing Comparisons: In search ofMethodology, en Iowa Law Review, 84, 1025-1038.
Page 186
Choudhry S. (ed.) (2006), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, Cambridge.
Cohén F.S. (1937), The Problem ofaFunctionalJurisprudence, enModern Law Review, vol. 1, n. 1, 5-26.
- (193 5), Trascendental Nonsense and the FunctionalMethod, en Columbia
Law Review, vol. XXXV, n. 6, 809-849.
Cohen-Tanugi L. (1985), Le droitsans I 'Etat: Sur la démocratie in France et in Amerique, París.
Collins H. (1991), Methods andAims of Comparative Contract Law, en Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, n. 11, 396-406.
Comte A. (1851-1854), Systéme de Politique: ou, Traite de Sociologie, Instituant la Religión de I 'Humanité, Paris.
Constantenesco L.J. ([1974] 2000), Traite de droit comparé, Tome II, La Méthode Comparative, Paris, trad. it. // método comparativo, Torino.
- ([1972] 2000), Die rechtsvergleichende Methode, vol. II, Kóln, trad. it.
Introduzione al diritto comparato, Torino.
- ([1971] 1996), Eenführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, vol. I, Rechtsver-gleichung, Kóln, trad. it. // método comparativo, Torino.
David R. (1950), Traite élémentaire de droit civil comparé: Introduction a I 'étude des droits étrangers et a la méthode comparative, Paris.
- ([1964] 2002), Les grands systems de droit contemporains, Paris, XII ed., avec Jauffret-Spinosi C.
Davis K. (1959), TheMyth ofFunctional Analysis as a Special Method in Sociology and Anthropology, en American Sociological Review, n. 24, 757-772.
De Cruz P (2007), Comparative Law in a Changing World, 3rd ed., Abeng-don, Oxon.
Delmas Marty M. (2006), Le pluralisme ordonné (lesforces imagenantes du droit), t. 2, Paris.
Page 187
- (2003), Etudes juridiques comparatives et internationalisation du droit, París.
Derrida J. (2003), Forcé de loi. Le «fondement mystique de l'autorité», París.
De Vergottini G. (2015), Tradizioni costituzionali e vincoli alia com-parazione, en Dirittopubblico comparato ed europeo, n. 4, 953-986.
- (2014), Diritto costituzionale comparato, IX ed., Padova. Domingo R. (2010), The New Global Law, Cambridge.
Durkheim E. (1895), The Rules ofthe SociologicalMethod, New York.
Eberle E.J. (2009), The Method and Role of Comparative Law, en Washington University GlobalStudiesLaw Review, vol. 8, n. 3,451-486.
Edge E. (2013), Islamicfinance, alternative dispute resolution andfamily law: developments towards legal pluralism?, en Griffith-Jones R. (ed.), Islam and English Law: Rights, Responsibilities and the Place ofShari'a, Cambridge, 116-143.
Esmein A. (1900), Le droit comparé etl'enseignement du droit, en Nouvelle revue historique de droit Frangais et étranger, vol. 24, 489-498.
Fauvarque-CossonB. (2006), Development qf Comparative Law inFrance, en Reimann M. and Zimmermann R. (eds.), The OxfordHandbook of Comparative Law, Oxford and New York, 36-67.
- (2002), L 'enseignement du droit comparé, en Revue internationale de droit comparé, vol. 54, n. 2, 293-309.
Feyerabend P. (197'5), AgainstMethod: Outline ofan Anarchistic Theory ofKnowledge. London, trad. it. Contro il método. Abbozzo di una teoría anarchica della conoscenza, Milano, 2013.
Ferraris M. (2012), Manifestó del nuovo realismo, Roma-Bari.
Fletcher G.P. (1998), Comparative Law as a Subversive Discipline, en American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 46, 683-700.
Frankemberg G. (2016), Comparative Law as Critique, Cheltenham.
Page 188
- (2006), Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideáis and Ideology - Toward a Layered Narrative, en International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 4,n. 3, 439-459.
- (1985), Critical Comparison: Re-tinking Comparative Law, en Harvard
International Law Journal, vol. 26, n. 22, 411-455.
Frankfurter F. (1927), The Task ofAdministrative Law, en University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 614-621.
Gabba C.F. (1862), Studii di legislazione civile comparata in servizio de lia nuova codificazione italiana, Milano.
Gámbaro A. (2003), // método comparatistico nel dirittoprivato. Obiettivi scientifici, en Scarciglia R. and Padovini F. (eds.), Diritto e universitá. Comparazione e formazione del giurista nel diritto europeo, Padova, 107-122.
Gámbaro A. and Sacco R. (1996), Sistemi giuridici comparati, Tormo.
García F.J., Between Cosmopolis and Community: Globalization and the Emergeng Basis for Global Justice, en New York University Journal of International Law andPolitics, vol. 46, n. 1, 1-53.
Gelter M. and Siems M.M. (eds.) (2014), Citations to Foreign Courts -Illegitimate andSuperfluous, or Unavoidable? Evidencefrom Europe, en American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 62, n. 1, 35-85.
Gerber D. J. (2011), Method, Community and Comparative Law: An En-counter with Complexity Science, en Roger Williams University Law Review, 16, 110-128.
- (2001), Sculpting the Agenda of Comparative Law: Ernst Rabel and the Fagade ofLanguage, en Riles A. (ed.), Rethlnkeng the Masters of Comparative Law, Oxford and...
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba