Bibliografía

AutorIñigo Zavala Ortiz De La Torre
Páginas455-497

Page 455

1. Autores

Adams, Edward S. y John H. Matheson. «A statutary model for corporate constituency concerns». Emory LawJournal 49 (2000): 1085-1138. Agle, Bradley R., Thomas Donaldson, R. Edward Freeman, Michael C.

Jensen, Ronald K. Mitchell, Donna J. Wood. «Dialogue: towards superior stakeholder theory». BusinessEthics Quarterly 18 (2008): 153-190. Agrawal, Ashwini K. «Corporate governance objectives of labor unión shareholders: evidence from proxy voting». New York University, http://archive.nyu.edu/bitstream/245 l/27848/2/wpa08006.pdf. Alchian, Armen A. y Harold Demsetz. «Production information costs, and economic organization». The American Economic Review 62 (1972) 5: 777-798. Alexander, Cindy R., Mark A. Chen, Duane J. Seppi, y Chester S. Spatt. «The ro\e of advisory servicesmproxy voting». NBERWorking Paper ng. 15143 (julio 2009). http://www.nber.org/papers/wl5143 Alien, William T. «Contracts and communities in corporate law». Washington and Lee Law Review 50, issue 4 (1993): 1395-1407.

Our schizophrenic conception of the business Corporation

. Cardozo Law Review (1992)14: 261-281. Alien, Franklin y Douglas Gale. Comparing financial systems. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2000. Amihud, Yacob y Baruch Lev, «Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomérate mergers». Bell Journal ofEconomics 12 (1981): 605-617. Anabtawi Imán, y Lynn Stout. «Fiduciary duties for activist shareholders».

Stanford Law Review 60 (2008): 1255-1309.

Page 456

Anderson, Ronald, Saltar Mansi y David Reeb. «Executive behavior: a creditor perspective on managerial ownership». En Corporate governance a synthesis oftheory, research, and practice. Eds. H. Kent Baker y Ronald Anderson, 427-450. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Andrés, Christian, André Betzer, Mark Goergen y Daniel Metzger, «Corporate governance systems». En Corporate governance a synthesis oftheory, research, and practice. Eds. H. Kent Baker y Ronald Anderson, 37-56.

Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Arcuri, Alessandra. «Eclecticism in law and economics». Erasmus Law Review 1(2008): 59-81. Armour, John y Michael Whincop. «The property foundations of corporate law». Oxford Journal ofLegal Studies 27 (2007): 429-465. Armour, John, Bernard S. Black y Brian Cheffins. «Delaware's balancing act».

Indiana Law Journal 87, issue 4 (2012): 1345-1405. Ashraf, Rasha, Narayanan Jayaraman y Harley E. Ryan, Jr. «Conflicts of interest and mutual fund proxy voting: Evidence from shareholder proposals on executive compensation». Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 47, n^ 3 (2012): 567-588. Auerbach, Alan y David Reishus. «The impact of taxation on mergers and acquisitions», 69-86. En Mergers and acquisitions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. Bainbridge,StephenM.«Amapofmodelbusiness Corporation Act states». http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2013/ll/a-map-of-model-business-corporation-act-states.html.

Community and statism: a conservative contractarian critique of progressive corporate law scholarship

. Cornell Law Review 82 (mayo 1997):856-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.10335.

Corporate governance after definancial crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Corporate law. 2- ed. New York: Foundation Press, 2009.

Director primacy: the means and ends of corporate governance

.

Northwestern University Law Review 97 (2003): 547-606.

Dodd-Frank: quack federal corporate governance round II

. Minnesota Law Review 95 (2011): 1779-1821.

- «Interpreting nonshareholders constituency statutes». Pepperdine Law Review 19 (1.992): 971-1028.

- Mergers and adquisitions. 3- ed. New York: Foundation Press, 2012.

- «Shareholder activism and institutional investors». University of California, Sc/joo/o/Low, UCLASchoolofLaw-Econ Research paper,nQ 05-02(2005).

Page 457

- «Shareholder activism in the Obama era» (2009). http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1437791,1.

- «The case for limited shareholders voting rights», UCLA Law Review 53 (2006): 601-636.

The politics of corporate governance: Roe's strong management, weak owners

, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 18 (1995): 673-733.

The new corporate governance in theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

The scope of the SECs authority over shareholders voting rights

. SEC http://www.sec.gov/comments/4-537/4537-17.pdf.

The shortlife and resurrection of SEC Rule 19c-4

. Washington University

Law Quarterly 69 (1991): 565-634. Bainbridge, Stephen y Todd Henderson. «Boards -R- us: reconceptualizing corporate boards». StanfordLaw Review 66 (2014):1051-1121. Baird, Douglas G. y Robert K. Rasmussen. «Prívate debt and the missing lever of corporate governance». University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154 (2006): 1209-1251. Baker, H. Kenty Ronald Anderson. Corporate governance: a synthesis of theory, research, and practice. Eds. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Baldwin, Robert, Martin Cave y Martin Lodge. Understanding regulation.

Theory, strategy, and practice. 2- ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. Barry Jordán, M. John William Hatfieldy ScottDuke Kominers. «On derivative markets and social welfare: a theory of empty voting and hidden ownership». Virginia Law Review 99 (2013): 1103-1168. Barzuza, Michael. «The state of state antitakeover law». Virginia Law Review 95 (2009): 1973-2052. Baysinger, Barry D. y Robert E. Hokisson. «The composition of board of directors and strategic control: effects on corporate strategy». Academy of Management Review 15 (1990)l: 72-87. Baysinger, Barry D. y Henry N. Butler. «The role of corporate law in the theory of the ftrm». Journal of Law and Economics 28 (1985): 179-191. Beasley Mark S. «An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of directors composition and financialstatementfraud».i4ccount;ngi?ev;ew 71 (1996)4: 443-465. Becht, Marco, Patrick Bolton y Ailsa Roel. «Corporate governance and control».

European Corporate Governance Institute. Finance Working Paper n°. 02 (2002): 1-124. Bebchuk, Lucían. «The case for increasing shareholder power». Harvard Law Review 118, issue 3 (2005): 833-914.

Page 458

Bebchuk, Lucían A., Alón Brav y Wei Jiang. «The long term effects of hedge fund activism». Columbio Law Review (forthcoming, 2015): 114. Bebchuk, Lucían. «The myth of the shareholder franchise». Virginia Law Review 93 (2007): 675-732. - «The myth that insulating boards serves long term valué». Columbio Law Review 113 (2013): 1637-1694. Benchuk, Lucían, Alma Cohén y Alien Ferrell. «What matters in corporate governance?». The Review offinancial studies 22 (2009): 783-827. Bebchuk, Lucían A., Alón Brav y Wei Jiang. «The long term effects of hedge fund activism». Columbio Law Review (forthcoming, 2015): 1085-1156. Belinfanti, Támara C. «The proxy adviser and corporate governance industry: the case for increased oversight and control». Stanford Journal ofLaw, Business & Finance 14, nQ 22 (2009): 1-56. Berchmans Vallet de Goytisolo, Juan. Manuales de Metodología Jurídica I.

Manual introductorio a las Metodologías del Derecho. Madrid: Fundación cultural del notariado, 2004.

Berle, Adolf A. Power without property. New York: Hardcourt Brace, 1959. Berle, Adolf A. y Gardiner C. Means. The modern Corporation and prívate property. Ed., 2009. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction, 1932. Berle, Adolf A. Studies in the law of corporate finance. Ed.,1985. Buffalo, New York: Williams S. Hein, 1928. Bhagat, Sanjai, Brian Bolton y Roberta Romano. «The promise and peril of corporate governance índices». Columbio Law Review 108 (2008): 1803-1882. Bisconti, Anthony. «The double bottom line: can constituency statutes protect socially responsible corporations stuck in Revlon Land?». Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 42 (2009): 765-808. Birdthistle, William A. «Compensation power: an analisys of rents and rewards in the mutual funds industry». Tulane Law Review 80 (2006): 1401-1465. Bishop, John D. «For-profit corporations in a just society: A social conduct argument concerning the rights and responsibilities of corporations».

BusinessEthics Quarterly 18, issue 2 (2008): 191-212. Black, Bernard S. «Agents watching agents: the promise of institutional investor voice». UCLA Law Review 39, nQ 4 (1992): 811-893.

Corporate law and residual claimants

(partial draft). Stanford Law andEconomics Olin Working Paper (mayo 2001): 1-45. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1528437.

Is corporate law trivial?: a political and economic analysis

. Northwestern University Law Review (1990)84: 542-597.

Page 459

Blair, Margaret M. «Corporate personhood and the corporate persona». University ofIllinois Law Review (2013): 785-820.

- «Reforming corporate governance. What history can teach us». Berkeley Business Law Journal 1 (2004): 1-183.

Blair, Margaret M. y Lynn A. Stout. «A team production theory of corporate law». Virginia Law Review 85 (1999): 247-328. Birdthistle, William A. «Compensation power: an analisys of rents and rewards in the mutual funds industry». Tulane Law Review 80 (2006): 1401-1465. Blodgett, Richard. «Union pensión fund assetmanagement». En Abuse on Wall Street: conflicts ofinterest on the securities markets. New York: Preager, 1980: 329-334. Boatright, John R. «Contractors as stakeholders: reconciling stakeholders theory with the nexus of contracts firm». Journal of Banking and Finance 26 (2002): 1837-1852.

- «Fiducuary duties and the shareholder-managementrelation: or what's so especial about shareholders?». Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (1994): 393-407.

Bottomley Stephen. The constitutional Corporation. Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate, 2008. Bradley Michael, Cindy A. Schipani, Anant K. Sundaram y James P. Walsh.

The purposes and accountability of the Corporation in contemporary society: corporate governance at a crossroads

. Law and Compemporary problems 62 (1999): 9-87. Brandéis, Louis D. Otherpeople's money andhow thebankers...

Para continuar leyendo

Solicita tu prueba

VLEX utiliza cookies de inicio de sesión para aportarte una mejor experiencia de navegación. Si haces click en 'Aceptar' o continúas navegando por esta web consideramos que aceptas nuestra política de cookies. ACEPTAR