Bibliografia
Autor | Xavier Ballart |
Páginas | 267-284 |
Page 267
ALBAREDA, M. 1988 Planes de Ocupación INEM-Corporaciones Locales, 1987 Barcelona: INEM
ALBI IBAÑEZ, E., J.A. RODRIGUEZ ONDARZA 1988 «Análisis Coste-Beneficio: Notas sobre su Situación Actual», Papeles de Economía Española, 37: 482-487
ALBRITTON, R.B.1979 «Measuring Public Policy: Impacts of the Supplemental Security Income Program», American Joumal of Political Science, 23: 560-578
ALBRITTON, R.B., T. WITAYAPANYANON 1989 «Impacts of SSI: A Reanalysis of Federal Welfare Policy», en R.D. BINGHAM, C.L. FELBINGER Evaluation in Practice White Plains, NY.: Longman
ALCAIDE INCHAUSTI, J. 1988 «El gasto público en la democracia española: los hechos», Papeles de Economía Española, 37: 2-41
ALVIRA MARTIN, F.1991 Metodología de la Evaluación de Programas Madrid: CIS
ARVIDSSON, G.1986 «Perfonnance Evaluation», en EX. KAUFMAN, G. MAJONE, J. OSTROM. Guidance, Control and Evaluation in the Public Sector Berlín: De Gruyter
BAENA DEL ALCAZAR, M. 1977 «El Poder Económico de la Burocracia en España», Infonnación Comercial Española, 522: 12-21
Page 268
BAENA DEL ALCAZAR, M. 1985 . Curso de Ciencia de la Administración Madrid: Tecnos
BALLBE, M. 1985 Orden Público y Militarismo en la España Constitucional (1812-1983) Madrid: Alianza Universidad
BAÑON, R. 1978 Poder de la Burocracia y Cortes Franquistas 1943-1971 Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública
BARNARD, C.I.1968 The Functions ofthe Executive. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press
BARZELAY, M., J.M. O'KEAN 1989 Gestión Pública Estratégica. Concepto, Análisis y Experiencias: El Caso IPIA Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales
BECKMAN, N. 1977 «Policy Analysis in Government: Altematives to 'Muddling Through'», Public Administration Review, 37: 221-222
BERCAL, T. E.1970 «Calls for Police Assistance: Consumer Demands for Govemment Service», American Behavioral Scientist 13: 681-692
BELTRAN, M. 1977 La Elite Burocrática Española Barcelona: Ariel
BELTRAN, M. 1991 La Productividad de la Administración Española: Un Análisis Comparativo Madrid: Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda
BINGHAM, R., C. FELBINGER 1989 Evaluation in Practice White Plains, NY.: Longman
Page 269
BLACK, D.J. 1970 «Production of Crime Rates,» American Sociological Review, 35: 733-748
BLAU, P.1955 The Dynamies ofBureaueraey. Chicago, IL.: The University of Chicago Press.
BLANCO, J.M. 1986 Informe INEM Barcelona: lNEM-Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
BLOCK, P.B.1974 Equality ofDistribution ofPoliee Serviees: A Case Study ofWashington D.C. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute
BOCIALETTI, G., R.E. KAPLAN 1986 «Self-Study for Human Services Agencies: Managing a Three-Sided Relationship», Evaluation and Program Planning 9: 1-11
BORUCO, R.F., A.J. McSWEENEY, E.J. SODERSTROM 1978 «Randomized Field Experiments for Program Planning, Development and Evaluation: An Illustrative Bibliography», Evaluation Quarterly, 2: 655-695
BORUS, M.E., W.E. TASO 1970 Measuring the Impaet ofManpower Programs. Ann Arbor, MI.: Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, University of Michigan - Wayne State University
BRYK, A.S.1983 Stakeholder Based Evaluation San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass
BROWN, J.D. 1973 The U.S. GAD's Changing Foeus as the Federal Government's Auditor, 1920-1972. (Tesis) Ann Arbof, MI.: UMI
Page 270
BROWN, R., R.D. PETHEL 1974 «A Matter of Facts: State Legislative Performance Auditing», Public Administration Review, 34: 318-326
BROWNE, A., A. WILDAVSKY, 1987 «What Should Evaluation Mean to Implementation », en D.J. PALUMBO The Politics 01Program Evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage
BUCHANAN, B. 1981 «The Senior Executive Service: How Can We Tell if it Works », Public Administration Review, 41: 349-358
BUTTOLPH JOHNSON, J., R.A. JOSLYN 1986 Political Science Research Methods Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quaterly Press
CAMPBELL, D., J. STANLEY 1973 Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores
CARO, F.G. 1971 «Evaluation in Comprehensive Urban Antipoverty Programs», en EG. CARO Readings in Evaluation Research, New York, NY: Rusell-Sage
CHELIMSKY, E. 1985 «Old Pattem and New Direction in Program Evaluation», en E. CHELIMSKY (ed.) Program Evaluation: Patterns and Directions, Washington, D.C.: American Society for Public Administration
CLARK, R.F. 1985 «The Proverbs of Evaluation», en E. CHELIMSKY Program Evaluation: Patterns and Directions Washington D.C.: American Society for Public Administration
COHEN, E., R. FRANCO 1988 Evaluación de Proyectos Sociales Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano
Page 271
COLEMAN, J.S. et al. 1966 Equality 01Educational Opportunity. Washinton D.C.: Government Printing Office
COOK, T.D., T.D. CAMPBELL 1976 Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues lor Field Settings. Skokie, IL.: Rand MacNally
COOK, T.D., W.R. SHADISH «Program Evaluation. The Wordly Science», en Evaluation Studies Review Annual. Vol 12.
CRONBACH, C.J. et al. 1980 Toward Relorm 01 Program Evaluation San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
CRONBACH, L.J.1982 Designing Evaluations 01Educational and Social Programs. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass
CROZIER, M.1964 The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago, IL.: The Universtiy of Chicago Press
DERLIEN, H.U. 1990 «Genesis and Structure of Evaluation Efforts in Comparative Perspective», en R.C.RIST(ed.) Program Evaluation and the Management olGovernment. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers
DIAMANT, A. 1962 «The Bureaucratic Model: Max Weber Rejected, Rediscovered and Reformed», en
F. HEDDY, S.L. STOKES (eds.) Papers in Comparative Public Administration, Ann Arbor, MI.: University of...
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba