Información jurídica inteligente
 España | 900 649 672

Abstract

Document Citado por Relacionados
Vincent
AutorLyonel Calderón Tello
Cargo del AutorDoctor en Derecho (Ph.D.)
Páginas43-44
43
CUADERNOS DE DOGMÁTICA JURÍDICA TEORÍA Y PRÁCTICA JURÍDICA
In this paper, a stance is introduced which ex-
plains that the objective element of the recklessness
offense does not differ at all from the objective element
of intentional crime and hence their differentiation is
on the side of the subjective element. e first relevant
consequence would be that the objective imputation
and its dogmatic sub-institutes govern in the same way
both modes. To build our position we started off the
pair policy-intellective knowledge/no criminally rele-
vant legal knowledge. In addition, we have proposed a
standardization of the types of guilt that understands
not as conscious/unconscious but as expected/not ex-
pected. Finally, the question of the gravity of the im-
prudence is addressed and it is noted that although this
does not add to the problem of determination of reck-
Abstract

Para continuar leyendo

Solicita tu prueba
Índice de navegación
Voces del tesauro

VLEX utiliza cookies de inicio de sesión para aportarte una mejor experiencia de navegación. Si haces click en 'Aceptar' o continúas navegando por esta web consideramos que aceptas nuestra política de cookies. ACEPTAR